# Literature: animal advocacy messaging

DR: How people respond to animal advocacy ads and what appeals to them more? XXX redacted

[David Moss](https://app.slack.com/team/U018T9S3SQN) Lots of things like this on Faunalytics

## Meat consumption appeals etc (?)

[Michael St. Jules](https://app.slack.com/team/U025P9B8ZLZ)

<https://thehumaneleague.org/article/E014R01-reducing-meat-consumption-appealing-animal-welfare-meta-analysis-protocol>

> There was **no clear trend showing which tactics were most effective.** Among the top ten, some used writing, pictures or virtual reality to show the suffering of animals on factory farms. Others added information about the health and environmental impacts of factory farming. Still others gave specific suggestions on how to eat less meat or discussed laws to improve how animals are treated on farms.
>
> \
> There was **no clear trend showing which psychological strategies were most effective**, although many different strategies were employed. Tactics often employed descriptions of how eating meat is becoming less normal, the emotions of farm animals, individual victims of factory farming, comparisons between farm animals and pets, and specific suggestions for how to eat less meat.The journal-published version:\
> [https://ww](https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195666321001847?via%3Dihub)[w.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195666321001847?via%3Dihub](https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195666321001847?via%3Dihub)
>
> [Michael St. Jules](https://app.slack.com/team/U025P9B8ZLZ) This is a re-analysis of one of the earlier studies the community has done on messaging:\
> <https://thehumaneleague.org/article/animal-cruelty-abolitionist-messaging-reanalysis>
>
> Some other older research (XXX redacted):\
> <https://animalcharityevaluators.org/blog/our-initial-thoughts-on-the-mfa-facebook-ads-study/>\
> <https://mercyforanimals.org/blog/impact-study/>\
> <https://mercyforanimals.org/blog/dominate-social-media/>

DR: Thanks. But I guess this stuff was mainly trying to appeal to the general public. XXX REDACTED I think the group that is being targeted is rather different.

Anytthing in the above seems specifically relevant to this, like stuff trying to get people who are already interested in animals to pursue it more seriously?


---

# Agent Instructions: Querying This Documentation

If you need additional information that is not directly available in this page, you can query the documentation dynamically by asking a question.

Perform an HTTP GET request on the current page URL with the `ask` query parameter:

```
GET https://globalimpact.gitbook.io/untitled/appendix/literature-on-animal-advocacy-messaging.md?ask=<question>
```

The question should be specific, self-contained, and written in natural language.
The response will contain a direct answer to the question and relevant excerpts and sources from the documentation.

Use this mechanism when the answer is not explicitly present in the current page, you need clarification or additional context, or you want to retrieve related documentation sections.
