LogoLogo
  • The Unjournal
  • An Introduction to The Unjournal
    • Content overview
    • How to get involved
      • Brief version of call
      • Impactful Research Prize (pilot)
      • Jobs and paid projects with The Unjournal
        • Advisory/team roles (research, management)
        • Administration, operations and management roles
        • Research & operations-linked roles & projects
        • Standalone project: Impactful Research Scoping (temp. pause)
      • Independent evaluations (trial)
        • Reviewers from previous journal submissions
    • Organizational roles and responsibilities
      • Unjournal Field Specialists: Incentives and norms (trial)
    • Our team
      • Reinstein's story in brief
    • Plan of action
    • Explanations & outreach
      • Press releases
      • Outreach texts
      • Related articles and work
    • Updates (earlier)
      • Impactful Research Prize Winners
      • Previous updates
  • Why Unjournal?
    • Reshaping academic evaluation: Beyond accept/reject
    • Promoting open and robust science
    • Global priorities: Theory of Change (Logic Model)
      • Balancing information accessibility and hazard concerns
    • Promoting 'Dynamic Documents' and 'Living Research Projects'
      • Benefits of Dynamic Documents
      • Benefits of Living Research Projects
    • The File Drawer Effect (Article)
    • Open, reliable, and useful evaluation
      • Multiple dimensions of feedback
  • Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
    • For research authors
    • Evaluation ('refereeing')
    • Suggesting and prioritizing research
  • Our policies: evaluation & workflow
    • Project submission, selection and prioritization
      • What research to target?
      • What specific areas do we cover?
      • Process: prioritizing research
        • Prioritization ratings: discussion
      • Suggesting research (forms, guidance)
      • "Direct evaluation" track
      • "Applied and Policy" Track
      • 'Conditional embargos' & exceptions
      • Formats, research stage, publication status
    • Evaluation
      • For prospective evaluators
      • Guidelines for evaluators
        • Why these guidelines/metrics?
        • Proposed curating robustness replication
        • Conventional guidelines for referee reports
      • Why pay evaluators (reviewers)?
      • Protecting anonymity
    • Mapping evaluation workflow
      • Evaluation workflow – Simplified
    • Communicating results
    • Recap: submissions
  • What is global-priorities-relevant research?
  • "Pivotal questions"
    • ‘Operationalizable’ questions
    • Why "operationalizable questions"?
  • Action and progress
    • Pilot steps
      • Pilot: Building a founding committee
      • Pilot: Identifying key research
      • Pilot: Setting up platforms
      • Setting up evaluation guidelines for pilot papers
      • 'Evaluators': Identifying and engaging
    • Plan of action (cross-link)
  • Grants and proposals
    • Survival and Flourishing Fund (successful)
    • ACX/LTFF grant proposal (as submitted, successful)
      • Notes: post-grant plan and revisions
      • (Linked proposals and comments - moved for now)
    • Unsuccessful applications
      • Clearer Thinking FTX regranting (unsuccessful)
      • FTX Future Fund (for further funding; unsuccessful)
      • Sloan
  • Parallel/partner initiatives and resources
    • eLife
    • Peer Communities In
    • Sciety
    • Asterisk
    • Related: EA/global priorities seminar series
    • EA and EA Forum initiatives
      • EA forum peer reviewing (related)
      • Links to EA Forum/"EA journal"
    • Other non-journal evaluation
    • Economics survey (Charness et al.)
  • Management details [mostly moved to Coda]
    • Governance of The Unjournal
    • Status, expenses, and payments
    • Evaluation manager process
      • Choosing evaluators (considerations)
        • Avoiding COI
        • Tips and text for contacting evaluators (private)
    • UJ Team: resources, onboarding
    • Policies/issues discussion
    • Research scoping discussion spaces
    • Communication and style
  • Tech, tools and resources
    • Tech scoping
    • Hosting & platforms
      • PubPub
      • Kotahi/Sciety (phased out)
        • Kotahi: submit/eval/mgmt (may be phasing out?)
        • Sciety (host & curate evals)
    • This GitBook; editing it, etc
    • Other tech and tools
      • Cryptpad (for evaluator or other anonymity)
      • hypothes.is for collab. annotation
Powered by GitBook
On this page

Was this helpful?

Export as PDF
  1. An Introduction to The Unjournal
  2. How to get involved
  3. Jobs and paid projects with The Unjournal

Research & operations-linked roles & projects

We are again considering application for the 'evaluation metrics/meta-science' role. We will also consider all applicants for our field specialist positions, and for roles that may come up in the future.

The potential roles discussed below combine research-linked work with operations and administrative responsibilities. Overall, this may include some combination of:

  • Assisting and guiding the process of identifying strong and potentially impactful work in key areas, explaining its relevance, its strengths, and areas warranting particular evaluation and scrutiny

  • Interacting with authors, recruiting, and overseeing evaluators

  • Synthesizing and disseminating the results of evaluations and ratings

  • Aggregating and benchmarking these results

  • Helping build and improve our tools, incentives, and processes

  • Curating outputs relevant to other researchers and policymakers

  • Doing "meta-science" work

See also our field specialist team pool and evaluator pool. Most of these roles involve compensation/honorariums. See Advisory/team roles (research, management)

Possible role: Research and Evaluation Specialist (RES)

Possible role details

Potential focus areas include global health; development economics; markets for products with large externalities (particularly animal agriculture); attitudes and behaviors (altruism, moral circles, animal consumption, effectiveness, political attitudes, etc.); economic and quantitative analysis of catastrophic risks; the economics of AI safety and governance; aggregation of expert forecasts and opinion; international conflict, cooperation, and governance; etc.

Work (likely to include a combination of):

  • Identify and characterize research (in the area of focus) that is most relevant for The Unjournal to evaluate

  • Summarize the importance of this work, its relevance to global priorities and connections to other research, and its potential limitations (needing evaluation)

  • Help build and organize the pool of evaluators in this area

  • Assist evaluation managers or serve as evaluation manager (with additional compensation) for relevant papers and projects

  • Synthesize and communicate the progress of research in this area and insights coming from Unjournal evaluations and author responses; for technical, academic, policy, and intelligent lay audiences

  • Participate in Unjournal meetings and help inform strategic direction

  • Liaise and communicate with relevant researchers and policymakers

  • Help identify and evaluate prize winners

  • Meta-research and direct quantitative meta-analysis (see "Project" below)

Desirable skills and experience:

Note: No single skill or experience is necessary independently. If in doubt, we encourage you to express your interest or apply.

  • Understanding of the relevant literature and methodology (to an upper-postgraduate level) in this field or a related field and technical areas, i.e., knowledge of the literature, methodology, and policy implications

  • Research and policy background and experience

  • Strong communication skills

  • Ability to work independently, as well as to build coalitions and cooperation

  • Statistics, data science and "aggregation of expert beliefs"

Proposed terms:

  • 300 hours (flexible, extendable) at $25–$55/hour USD (TBD, depending on experience and skills)

  • This is a contract role, open to remote and international applicants. However, the ability to attend approximately weekly meetings and check-ins at times compatible with the New York timezone is essential.

Length and timing:

  • Flexible; to be specified and agreed with the contractor.

  • We are likely to hire one role starting in Summer 2023, and another starting in Autumn 2023.

  • Extensions, growth, and promotions are possible, depending on performance, fit, and our future funding.

Express your interest here. (Nov. 2023: Note, we can not guarantee that we will be hiring for this role, because of changes in our approach.)

PreviousAdministration, operations and management rolesNextStandalone project: Impactful Research Scoping (temp. pause)

Last updated 1 year ago

Was this helpful?