LogoLogo
Ctrlk
  • The Unjournal
  • An Introduction to The Unjournal
    • Content overview
    • How to get involved
    • Organizational roles and responsibilities
    • Our team
    • Plan of action
    • Explanations & outreach
      • Press releases
      • Outreach texts
      • Related articles and work
    • Updates (earlier)
  • Why Unjournal?
  • Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
  • Our policies: evaluation & workflow
  • What is global-priorities-relevant research?
  • "Pivotal questions"
  • Action and progress
  • Grants and proposals
  • Parallel/partner initiatives and resources
  • Management details [mostly moved to Coda]
  • Tech, tools and resources
Powered by GitBook
On this page
  • Improving peer review in Economics:
  • Evidence base

Was this helpful?

  1. An Introduction to The Unjournal
  2. Explanations & outreach

Related articles and work

We are not the only ones working and advocating in this space. For a small tip of the iceberg...

LogoPeer Review: Implementing a "publish, then review" model of publishingeLife
LogoThe big idea: should we get rid of the scientific paper?The Guardian
Stuart Ritchie

Improving peer review in Economics:

LogoEconomists want to see changes to their peer review system. Let’s do something about it.CEPR
LogoEVALUATING RESEARCHEVALUATING RESEARCH
"A Journal is just a Twitter feed"

Evidence base

  • The effect of publishing peer review reports on referee behavior in five scholarly journals

  • Improving Peer Review in Economics: Stocktaking and Proposals

  • What Policies Increase Prosocial Behavior? An Experiment with Referees at the Journal of Public Economics

  • Are non-monetary rewards effective in attracting peer reviewers? A natural experiment

PreviousOutreach textsNextUpdates (earlier)

Last updated 2 years ago

Was this helpful?