> For the complete documentation index, see [llms.txt](https://globalimpact.gitbook.io/the-unjournal-project-and-communication-space/llms.txt). Markdown versions of documentation pages are available by appending `.md` to page URLs; this page is available as [Markdown](https://globalimpact.gitbook.io/the-unjournal-project-and-communication-space/readme-1/writings/related-articles-and-work.md).

# Related articles and work

We are not the only ones working and advocating in this space. For a small tip of the iceberg...

{% embed url="<https://elifesciences.org/articles/64910>" %}

{% embed url="<https://www.theguardian.com/books/2022/apr/11/the-big-idea-should-we-get-rid-of-the-scientific-paper>" %}
Stuart Ritchie
{% endembed %}

### [Improving peer review in Economics:](https://evalresearch.weebly.com/)

{% embed url="<https://cepr.org/voxeu/columns/economists-want-see-changes-their-peer-review-system-lets-do-something-about-it>" %}

{% embed url="<https://evalresearch.weebly.com/>" %}

{% embed url="<https://wyclif.substack.com/p/9049fb71-5968-40d9-bf72-e06919fa56a2?s=r>" %}
"A Journal is just a Twitter feed"
{% endembed %}

## **Evidence base**

* [The effect of publishing peer review reports on referee behavior in five scholarly journals](https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-018-08250-2)
* [Improving Peer Review in Economics: Stocktaking and Proposals](https://evalresearch.weebly.com/uploads/1/3/3/4/133478410/improving_peer_review_in_economics_-_charness_et_al..pdf)
* [What Policies Increase Prosocial Behavior? An Experiment with Referees at the Journal of Public Economics](https://www.aeaweb.org/full_issue.php?doi=10.1257/jep.28.3#page=173)
* [Are non-monetary rewards effective in attracting peer reviewers? A natural experiment](https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Marco-Seeber-2/publication/327786292_Are_non-monetary_rewards_effective_in_attracting_peer_reviewers_A_natural_experiment/links/5bb7649e299bf1049b6feacf/Are-non-monetary-rewards-effective-in-attracting-peer-reviewers-A-natural-experiment.pdf)


---

# Agent Instructions
This documentation is published with GitBook. GitBook is the documentation platform designed so that both humans and AI agents can read, navigate, and reason over technical content effectively. Learn more at gitbook.com.

## Querying This Documentation
If you need additional information that is not directly available in this page, you can query the documentation dynamically by asking a question.

Perform an HTTP GET request on the current page URL with the `ask` query parameter, and the optional `goal` query parameter:

```
GET https://globalimpact.gitbook.io/the-unjournal-project-and-communication-space/readme-1/writings/related-articles-and-work.md?ask=<question>&goal=<endgoal>
```

`ask` is the immediate question: it should be specific, self-contained, and written in natural language.
`goal` is optional and describes the broader end goal you are ultimately trying to accomplish on behalf of the user. GitBook uses it to tailor the answer towards what is most useful for that goal.

The response will contain a direct answer to the question and relevant excerpts and sources from the documentation.

Use this mechanism when the answer is not explicitly present in the current page, you need clarification or additional context, or you want to retrieve related documentation sections.