> For the complete documentation index, see [llms.txt](https://globalimpact.gitbook.io/the-unjournal-project-and-communication-space/llms.txt). Markdown versions of documentation pages are available by appending `.md` to page URLs; this page is available as [Markdown](https://globalimpact.gitbook.io/the-unjournal-project-and-communication-space/pivotal-questions/why-operationalizable-questions.md).

# Why "operationalizable questions"?

Why are we seeking these pivotal questions to be 'operationalizable'?\\

1. This is in line with [our own focus](https://globalimpact.gitbook.io/the-unjournal-project-and-communication-space/policies-projects-evaluation-workflow/considering-projects/what-specific-areas-do-we-cover#fields-methods-and-approaches) on this type of research
   1. The Unjournal [mainly focuses on](#user-content-fn-1)[^1] evaluating (largely empirical) research that clearly poses and answers specific impactful questions, rather than research that seeks to define a question, survey a broad landscape of other research, open routes to further inquiry, etc.
2. I think this will help us focus on fully-baked questions, where the answer is likely to provide actual value to the target organization and others (and avoid the old ‘[42’](https://www.wikiwand.com/simple/42_\(answer\)) trap).
3. It offers potential for benchmarking and validation (e.g., using prediction markets), specific routes to measure our impact (updated beliefs, updated decisions), and informing the ['claim identification (and assessment)'](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1mBkAmCVomcUt0Ks7hsxShTsjAbx3WVtFfMCnasGQxns/edit) we’re asking from evaluators (see footnote above).

However, as this initiative progresses we may allow a wider range of questions, e.g., more open-ended, multi-outcome, non-empirical (perhaps ‘normative), and best-practice questions.

[^1]: However, we have evaluated some broader work where it seemed particularly high impact, original, and substantive. E.g., we’ve evaluated work in ‘applied economic theory’ such as [Aghion et al](https://unjournal.pubpub.org/pub/aimetrics/release/9). on the impact of artificial intelligence on economic growth, and applied methodology, e.g., ["Replicability & Generalisability: A Guide to CEA discounts"](https://unjournal.pubpub.org/pub/evalsumtemplateapplied/release/1).


---

# Agent Instructions
This documentation is published with GitBook. GitBook is the documentation platform designed so that both humans and AI agents can read, navigate, and reason over technical content effectively. Learn more at gitbook.com.

## Querying This Documentation
If you need additional information that is not directly available in this page, you can query the documentation dynamically by asking a question.

Perform an HTTP GET request on the following URL with the `ask` and `goal` query parameters:

```
GET https://globalimpact.gitbook.io/the-unjournal-project-and-communication-space/pivotal-questions/why-operationalizable-questions.md?ask=<question>&goal=<user_goal>
```

`ask` is the immediate question: it should be specific, self-contained, and written in natural language.
`goal` is what the user is ultimately trying to achieve, the reason they need the answer. Sharing it helps GitBook give you a better, more relevant answer. A goal is most helpful when it describes the outcome the user wants rather than restating the question. For example, with `ask=how do I create an API token`, a goal like `build a script that syncs our docs to a CMS` lets GitBook tailor the answer to that use case.

The response will contain a direct answer to the question and relevant excerpts and sources from the documentation.

Use this mechanism when the answer is not explicitly present in the current page, you need clarification or additional context, or you want to retrieve related documentation sections.