📦
[Redirect to unjournal.org] The Unjournal...
  • Redirection notice
  • PAGE MOVED -- The Unjournal (introduction)
    • Contents Page
    • How to be part of this
      • Brief version of call
      • Impactful Research Prize
        • Recap: submissions
    • Our team
      • Our team
      • Reinstein's story in brief
    • Plan of action
    • Explanations & outreach
      • Outreach texts
      • Related articles and work
    • Latest updates
  • PAGE moved -- Why Unjournal?
    • Evaluation reduces the costs of 'the publication game'
    • More reliable and useful evaluation
      • Multiple dimensions of feedback
    • Enabling dynamic docs & 'living projects'
      • Benefits of 'dynamic docs'
      • 'Living research projects'
    • The File Drawer Effect (Article)
    • Global priorities: Theory of Change
      • Aside: Open access and 'information hazards'
    • Promoting open, robust science
  • FAQ (authors, evaluators)
    • For Researchers/Authors
    • Evaluation (refereeing)
    • ("Global Priorities")
  • Our policies: Evaluation & workflow
    • Considering papers (projects)
      • 'Direct evaluation' track
      • What research to target?
    • Evaluation
      • Guidelines for Evaluators
        • Why these guidelines?
        • Evaluation form (Gdoc)
        • Proposed: 'curating robustness replication'
      • 'Why pay evaluators (reviewers)'?
      • Protecting anonymity
    • Mapping evaluation workflow
    • Communicating results
  • The field and EA/gp research
    • What is EA/gp relevant research?
    • Syllabi
  • Action and progress
    • Building the founding committee
    • Identifying key research
    • Setting up platforms
    • Setting up evaluation guidelines for pilot papers
    • 'Evaluators': Identifying and engaging
  • Grants and proposals
    • ACX/LTFF grant proposal (as submitted, successful)
      • Notes: post-grant plan and revisions
      • (Linked proposals and comments - moved for now)
    • Unsuccessful applications
      • Clearer thinking FTX regranting (Unsuccessful)
      • FTX Future Fund (for further funding; unsuccessful)
    • Applications in progress (and planning)
  • Relevant initiatives & resources
    • (eLife: Comparison coming soon)
    • Sciety
    • Asterisk
    • Related: EA/gp seminar series
    • EA and EA forum initiatives
      • EA forum peer reviewing (related)
      • Links to EA Forum/'EA journal'
    • Other non-journal evaluation
    • Economics survey (Charness et. al.)
  • Management/tech details, discussion
    • Governance of The Unjournal
    • Evaluation Manager Process
      • Choosing evaluators
        • Avoiding COI
        • Tips and text for contacting evaluators (private)
    • Hosting & platforms
      • Fiscal hosting and expenses
      • PubPub
      • Kotahi/Sciety (may be phasing out?)
        • Kotahi: submit/eval/mgmt
        • Sciety (host & curate evals)
          • hypothes.is 'feeding' Sciety
        • Docs to md conversion
    • Tech scoping
    • Other tech and tools
      • Cryptpad (for evaluator or other anonymity)
      • hypothes.is for collab. annotation
    • Policies/issues discussion
    • This Gitbook; editing it, etc
    • UJ Team: resources, onboarding
Powered by GitBook
On this page

Was this helpful?

Edit on GitHub
Export as PDF
  1. Our policies: Evaluation & workflow

Mapping evaluation workflow

PreviousProtecting anonymityNextCommunicating results

Last updated 1 year ago

Was this helpful?

This website has been moved . Please go to that page and search for the page with a similar header there; you can ask questions on using command-k on Mac, or control-k on Windows.

HERE
that page