📦
[Redirect to unjournal.org] The Unjournal...
  • Redirection notice
  • PAGE MOVED -- The Unjournal (introduction)
    • Contents Page
    • How to be part of this
      • Brief version of call
      • Impactful Research Prize
        • Recap: submissions
    • Our team
      • Our team
      • Reinstein's story in brief
    • Plan of action
    • Explanations & outreach
      • Outreach texts
      • Related articles and work
    • Latest updates
  • PAGE moved -- Why Unjournal?
    • Evaluation reduces the costs of 'the publication game'
    • More reliable and useful evaluation
      • Multiple dimensions of feedback
    • Enabling dynamic docs & 'living projects'
      • Benefits of 'dynamic docs'
      • 'Living research projects'
    • The File Drawer Effect (Article)
    • Global priorities: Theory of Change
      • Aside: Open access and 'information hazards'
    • Promoting open, robust science
  • FAQ (authors, evaluators)
    • For Researchers/Authors
    • Evaluation (refereeing)
    • ("Global Priorities")
  • Our policies: Evaluation & workflow
    • Considering papers (projects)
      • 'Direct evaluation' track
      • What research to target?
    • Evaluation
      • Guidelines for Evaluators
        • Why these guidelines?
        • Evaluation form (Gdoc)
        • Proposed: 'curating robustness replication'
      • 'Why pay evaluators (reviewers)'?
      • Protecting anonymity
    • Mapping evaluation workflow
    • Communicating results
  • The field and EA/gp research
    • What is EA/gp relevant research?
    • Syllabi
  • Action and progress
    • Building the founding committee
    • Identifying key research
    • Setting up platforms
    • Setting up evaluation guidelines for pilot papers
    • 'Evaluators': Identifying and engaging
  • Grants and proposals
    • ACX/LTFF grant proposal (as submitted, successful)
      • Notes: post-grant plan and revisions
      • (Linked proposals and comments - moved for now)
    • Unsuccessful applications
      • Clearer thinking FTX regranting (Unsuccessful)
      • FTX Future Fund (for further funding; unsuccessful)
    • Applications in progress (and planning)
  • Relevant initiatives & resources
    • (eLife: Comparison coming soon)
    • Sciety
    • Asterisk
    • Related: EA/gp seminar series
    • EA and EA forum initiatives
      • EA forum peer reviewing (related)
      • Links to EA Forum/'EA journal'
    • Other non-journal evaluation
    • Economics survey (Charness et. al.)
  • Management/tech details, discussion
    • Governance of The Unjournal
    • Evaluation Manager Process
      • Choosing evaluators
        • Avoiding COI
        • Tips and text for contacting evaluators (private)
    • Hosting & platforms
      • Fiscal hosting and expenses
      • PubPub
      • Kotahi/Sciety (may be phasing out?)
        • Kotahi: submit/eval/mgmt
        • Sciety (host & curate evals)
          • hypothes.is 'feeding' Sciety
        • Docs to md conversion
    • Tech scoping
    • Other tech and tools
      • Cryptpad (for evaluator or other anonymity)
      • hypothes.is for collab. annotation
    • Policies/issues discussion
    • This Gitbook; editing it, etc
    • UJ Team: resources, onboarding
Powered by GitBook
On this page

Was this helpful?

Edit on GitHub
Export as PDF
  1. Grants and proposals
  2. Unsuccessful applications

Clearer thinking FTX regranting (Unsuccessful)

PreviousUnsuccessful applicationsNextFTX Future Fund (for further funding; unsuccessful)

Last updated 1 year ago

Was this helpful?

This website has been moved . Please go to that page and search for the page with a similar header there; you can ask questions on using command-k on Mac, or control-k on Windows.

HERE
that page