The Unjournal
An Introduction to The Unjournal
Why Unjournal?
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
Our policies: evaluation & workflow
What is global-priorities-relevant research?
"Pivotal questions" initiative
- ‘Operationalizable’ questions
- Why "operationalizable questions"?
Action and progress
- Pilot steps
  Pilot: Building a founding committee
  Pilot: Identifying key research
  Pilot: Setting up platforms
  Setting up evaluation guidelines for pilot papers
  'Evaluators': Identifying and engaging
- Plan of action (cross-link)
Grants and proposals
Parallel/partner initiatives and resources
Management details [mostly moved to Coda]
Tech, tools and resources

Powered by GitBook

On this page

Improving peer review in Economics:
Evidence base

Was this helpful?

Related articles and work

PreviousOutreach texts NextUpdates (earlier)

Last updated 1 year ago

#536:

Change request updated 1 month ago

We are not the only ones working and advocating in this space. For a small tip of the iceberg...

Improving peer review in Economics:

Evidence base

The effect of publishing peer review reports on referee behavior in five scholarly journals
Improving Peer Review in Economics: Stocktaking and Proposals
What Policies Increase Prosocial Behavior? An Experiment with Referees at the Journal of Public Economics
Are non-monetary rewards effective in attracting peer reviewers? A natural experiment

Peer Review: Implementing a "publish, then review" model of publishingeLife

Economists want to see changes to their peer review system. Let’s do something about it.CEPR

EVALUATING RESEARCHEVALUATING RESEARCH