Choosing evaluators (considerations)

Things we consider in choosing evaluators (i.e., 'reviewers')

  1. Did the people who suggested the paper suggest any evaluators?

  2. We prioritize our "evaluator pool" (people who signed up)

  3. Expertise in the aspects of the work that needs evaluation

  4. Interest in the topic/subject

  5. Conflicts of interest (especially co-authorships)

  6. Secondary concerns: Likely alignment and engagement with Unjournal priorities. Good writing skills. Time and be motivation to write review promptly and thoroughly.

Last updated

#536:

Change request updated