Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Team members: see also UJ Team: resources, onboarding for a quick guide to 'the things you need to access and use'
Tech scoping: Overview of the tools and solutions the Unjournal uses, is building, and needs
Hosting & platforms: Where we host the evaluation output and submission/editorial management processes
(See also Status, expenses, and payments)
Updated see Gdoc on 'Editorial Management Tech needs HERE and embedded at bottom (to do: integrate these discussions)
We are eligible/may be eligible for some nonprofit discounts
Hosting 'qualitative' evaluation content: A place to host the evaluations (as well as the authors’ responses and the editors' comments), allowing the public to read them in an attractive and convenient way (and perhaps respond to them). Ideally this will also make the quantitative ratings and predictions prominent and connected to the evaluations. This system needs to allow evaluations of any research that is publicly hosted and has a DOI.
DOIs, Bibliometrics, Google Scholar: We need these evaluations to be visible in "bibliometric systems". They need a DOI, they need to show up in Google scholar and other search tools. The references cited in the evaluations (including the original paper) should also appear in the bibliometric record. Right now 'CrossRef' seems to be the leading system for this.
Curation and organization: A place to bring together all of the evaluations we have done as the sort of center of our project, to explain it and get positive attention, as well as engage participation and readership.
'Editorial management': A tool to coordinate our management process (submissions, evaluations, et cetera)
Hosting and open-analysis of 'quantitative' ratings and meta-data: A place to organize the evaluation data, particularly the quantitative ratings and predictions, in ways that people can analyze and use.
Ideally also...
Ways to enable evaluators and others to do collaborative annotation on pre-prints
Integrations with other platforms including prediction markets and OSF
Platforms for people to engage in other ways, perhaps up- and downrating evaluations etc
We have a partially-built system combining Sciety, Kotahi, and Hypothes.is. However, other tools and bespoke work will be needed to achieve some of the goals stated above.
2023 Update: We have moved mainly to PubPub, at least for hosting evaluation output (see https://unjournal.pubpub.org/)
\
Ideally also, this would update automatically. We might also want to give some nice analysis and visualization for this (although we could do that in one of the other pages, simply bringing in the data from this place where it’s stored). An API and link to other data archives could be useful.
14 Nov 2022: For now, only managers/editors and authors will interact with this page. We plan to adapt it to become the interface for evaluations as well.
13 Dec 2022: Moving in this direction
Currently, the majority of our process is not done through Kotahi. We would need funds to make a more bespoke interface.
Domain name: unjournal.org should take people to dashboard page (or login if necessary)
Will change this to: unjournalplatform.org 14 Nov 2022-- the login page is taking people to the wrong place for now
Gets into a single hypothes.is account: https://hypothes.is/users/TheUnjournal
This is essentially a workaround database. We are not using the full features of hypothes.is yet. See this slack thread/this Gdoc for the thoughts and progress on this.
As we often use Gdocs, see "Docs to md conversion" tips
Group in preparation:
Goal: get Unjournal.org to redirect here
Expected to be ready in early December 2022.
We are currently using PubPub (https://unjournal.pubpub.org/) as our main platform for hosting evaluations and ratings, manager summaries, and author responses. It offers flexibility, a good user-experience, and a range of features to help us integrate this work into the bibliometrics and archives (e.g., assigning DOIs). (See discussion of options in "Options for hosting reviews" doc.) We may find ways to use it in our submission platform and editorial management workflow as well; we are exploring this further.Some relevant private Gdocs (ask for access):
Unjournal pubpub current process and automation plans (~instructions for adding evaluation packages to our page)
Piloting Unjournal on PubPub: notes (includes discussion of initial setup of PubPub space)
See my notes on another GitBook here, on how to edit it, etc.
Some quick points:
GitBook is mainly used for tech documentation; but it has some important strengths and it's pretty good for general use.
It is based in markdown and other simple flat text files.
It synchronizes through Git/Github, and you can push and pull ... but you can also select "edit" and "merge" and use it fairly WYSIWYG.
They have a good support team (try their chat/help button).
Also consider our 'style guide' linked here (for this and other communications)
18 Jun 2023 -- needs moving after moving GitBook location
Switching between the public and private versions of GitBook (while maintaining the same relative page) is a pain.
Semi-automate: going from the editable to the public version with a 'bookmarklet'
Setting the following as a ‘bookmark’ seems to help (Chrome: bookmarks manager, edit any existing bookmark by right click --> edit)
Name: “Switch to Public GitBook page” (or whatever)
URL: set to:
To go in the other direction (public to editable version of a page)
Setting the following as a "bookmark" seems to help (chrome: bookmarks manager, edit any existing bookmark by right click --> edit)
Name: “Switch to Editable GitBook page” (or whatever)
URL: set to:
See: